Spirit Filled Without Tongues

Spirit Filled Without Tongues

“Don’t try to analyze or rationalize the sound coming out of your mouth. Your brain will try to shut it down because it is not English. It is your private prayer language. Jude 20 says you build yourself up on your most holy faith by praying in the Holy Spirit. The devil cannot understand this language, and he does not want you to have it because it is the perfect prayer. You cannot mess it up. I am going to pray in my prayer language next to you, and I want you to focus on the sound coming out of my mouth. Then just start moving your mouth, and the first sound that comes bubbling up within you, let it out. It may be only one syllable. That’s all right. It will grow with time to other syllables. Are you ready for this baptism of fire?”

These words are similar to what was said to me many years ago on the day I was said to have received the baptism of the Holy Spirit. These words would become the “script” I would say to others when helping them to receive their prayer language during altar calls. It was a normal part of my life for years. I could pray in tongues at will. I still have a copy of the little red book I received concerning the gift of tongues. It was said to benefit those who were new to the baptism of the Holy Spirit.

I had no idea what I was saying, but I was assured from years of teaching it was without error. I was told God may give me the interpretation at times, but for the most part, I would not understand what I was saying. These were the groanings that could not be uttered in Romans 8. Yet, I was uttering them. There were corporate gatherings I attended where we were encouraged as a group to begin to pray in tongues simultaneously. There were times it was initiated because the minister sensed demonic resistance in the atmosphere. When the instruction was given to pray in our prayer language, we did it, erupting in a cacophony of tongues that in retrospect was rebellious to the instruction found in the Word of God (1 Corinthians 14:26-28).

There were gatherings where an individual gave a tongue and then another was said to have interpreted it. There were numerous times I prayed in tongues or sang in tongues in corporate gatherings on a microphone without an interpretation. That too was rebellion against God in more ways than one. In the circles I affiliated, there was rarely ever a discussion about what really happened on the day of Pentecost. Rather, that passage was misappropriated for private prayer languages rather than contextually relaying how sixteen different nations heard Galileans speaking in their own languages (known languages in the earth unknown to those speaking) and telling of the mighty works of God (Acts 2:11).

But it did not stop there. The baptism in the Spirit with the evidence of speaking in tongues was said to be proof you were indeed Spirit filled. There are some professing believers who say you cannot be saved without speaking in tongues. Respectfully, the burden of proof is on those who claim such a thing as Scripture does not support this (1 Corinthians 12:30). Being Spirit filled was almost a prerequisite for our youth when considering dating. It was not uncommon as a youth leader to warn our youth not to date those who were not Spirit filled or did not attend a Spirit filled church. Being born again was not considered as being Spirit filled. No, that person must speak in tongues or the prospect was a waste of time and could be spiritually detrimental to the one who was a tongue talker.

For years, I prayed in tongues. At least, I thought I did. It was not until I came out of the movement I was once a part and began to read the Bible in context while testing that little red book I had sitting on my bookshelf that I became uncomfortable with what I was doing. Personally, the conviction became so great that I stopped. Now for those who vehemently disagree with me and lovingly hold tight to their prayer language, I consider this a secondary issue. True believers in Christ holding to the core tenets of Christianity are brothers and sisters in Christ. But I respectfully disagree that speaking in tongues is a core tenet, nor is it the hallmark of recognizing one who is Spirit filled.

What I find interesting is there are some, as I once did, who make the evidence of speaking in tongues a primary issue. A hierarchy is unintentionally created, making the distinction between those who speak in tongues and those who do not and describing those without the evidence as dead and void of the Spirit. I would dare say many holding to this have not considered the implication of such a perceived superiority. Many are not aware of other religions who have similar manifestations such as unintelligible tongues. I would also say there is a great disconnect in what it truly means to be Spirit filled.

Walk Like an Ephesian

Before we get into the meat of Ephesians, I would like to make a few observations. First, it is worth noting that Jesus Christ who had the Spirit without measure is never recorded speaking in a private prayer language. Why is that? We also do not see the early church in Acts using practices such as telling someone to not think about what they are saying and to simply start with a syllable. When the Holy Spirit filled individuals as He did in Acts, we see this filling was an empowerment for a single event or a work of service. In fact, this is a different Greek word than is used for being filled in Ephesians 5:18. When people spoke in tongues, it was a sign to unbelievers (1 Corinthians 14:20-23). It was not unintelligible syllables but known languages unknown to those speaking. Peter states this in Acts 11 when speaking with the counsel that what occurred with Cornelius and his family was “as on us at the beginning” (Acts 11:15). This is in reference to Acts 2 on the day of Pentecost.

We need to acknowledge that Jesus Christ told His disciples in John 14:16 He would ask the Father for the Advocate, the Holy Spirit, to help them and to be with them forever. We, too, are His disciples if we abide in Him and His word. At the moment of salvation, we are indwelt by the Holy Spirit, and the Holy Spirit testifies of Jesus Christ, not Himself. There is no hierarchy of believers in Christ. No one is superior for any reason. Ephesians 2:9 assures us we cannot boast in any work regarding our salvation. This includes tongues. Furthermore, Ephesians 1:13 states, “In him you also, when you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation, and believed in him, were sealed with the promised Holy Spirit.” Ephesians 4:30 reiterates this sealing for the day of redemption by the Holy Spirit. Be encouraged, dear Christian. When the Spirit of God seals us, our salvation is secure in Christ. It is His work, not our own.

When looking at Ephesians 5:18, we find the word filled being used, which is commonly taken out of context to approve of being drunk in the Spirit. That is a different topic for a different day. This verse is in essence talking about spiritual maturity, and the Greek word used here refers to a continual process of growth and maturity. Here Paul creates a dichotomy between those who conduct themselves in a worldly way and those who are led by the Spirit. He talks of those who commit debauchery versus those who understand their lives are to be Christ centered, praising Him, thanking Him, and reverencing Him rather than participating in unfruitful works and living as sons of disobedience, references found in this very chapter. Debauchery is excess in worldly delight. Being truly Spirit filled is a mature delight in Christ, which is never excessive. It always helps us to look at verses in context with those surrounding it.

There is so much more that could be said about this, discussions on 1 Corinthians 14 and Paul’s correction to the church on their misuse of tongues, questions on how Satan cannot understand a heavenly prayer language while having been a former inhabitant of heaven, the use of thought stopping tactics regardless of intention, the fact that Ephesians 4 and 1 Corinthians 12 speaks of one baptism, what Jude 20 means, and how none of the gifts are to be for personal edification according to Scripture, though tongues is made to be an exception by man . We could discuss the lack of obedience to God’s instruction to not speak in tongues all at once without an interpretation while claiming to be full of God’s Spirit, which would be attributing disobedience to the Holy Spirit. We could point out that when tongues were exhibited, the gospel of Jesus Christ was preached, and being filled for a work of service did not always equate to speaking in tongues. No pun intended, but it would appear the emPHAsis has been placed on the wrong sylLABle.

Being Spirit-filled is centered upon a continual process of spiritual growth and maturity that can only be found and cultivated by the Spirit of God. By submitting to this process, we glorify the Lord Jesus Christ in word and deed while being conformed to His image through the power of the Holy Spirit dwelling within and filling us continually. Being Spirit filled applies to believers in Christ, understanding that fruit of the Spirit will be found in the life of a believer (Galatians 5:22,23). This is a daily submission as we walk with the Lord in progressive sanctification, yielding to the Holy Spirit in being filled for His glory and being empowered for proclaiming the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

My name is Dawn Hill. I am Spirit filled, and I do not speak in tongues. This is not an assault on speaking in tongues nor those who do. This is simply a loving reminder for us as believers in Christ Jesus to keep it Biblical and to understand what it truly means to be Spirit filled.

Please follow and like us:

12 thoughts on “Spirit Filled Without Tongues

  1. Thank you for writing this Dawn it truly challenges me to dig deeper into the truth of Gods word after 35 years of being entangled in the Word of Faith and New Apostolic Reformation movement. I agree with your points and biblical discernment. I ask this question sincerely How do we know we are sealed unto the day of redemption? Is it truly by our confession and turning to Jesus through the prayer of salvation or has God through His sovereignty just selected us? Blessings Lisa Meszaros

    1. That is a great question, Lisa. If I am not mistaken, you may be talking about election. There are differing views on this as to when someone is part of God’s elect, whether it was from the beginning and He already knows those who are His, or in the very idea that from the moment of salvation we are His elect. When reading these particular verses of being sealed for the day of redemption, it seems to be talking about having eternal security. There are debates about that as well. It seems to be both. I am by no means a theologian. I will say that to believe in eternal security is not a pass to sin. Rather, it is an understanding that our salvation is not based on our merit or work. It is based on the finished work of Christ on the cross. John 10:27-29 says, “My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me. I give them eternal life, and they will never perish, and no one will snatch them out of my hand. My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all, and no one is able to snatch them out of the Father’s hand.” This is a salvation passage. It helps us to see the power of salvation and who gives eternal life. It shows us that no one, not even ourselves, can overpower God in that.

      With regard to being sovereignly selected, John 6:44 says, “No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him, And I will raise him up on the last day.” It would appear that our confession of repentance and faith in Christ is linked with the Father softening our hearts and drawing us to Christ. Again, it focuses on God’s work, the sovereignty of God rather than the sovereignty of man. I have much more to study and learn about this, but these are some things I have come across in looking at this topic. I hope this helps!

      1. Does God choose us because we choose Him? Or do we choose Him because He chose us? I think that somehow BOTH ARE TRUE.

  2. I just wanted to say how very much I appreciate your blog. Coming from a similar background and trying to slog through everything, finding truth without being (or coming across as) judgemental is tricky. Of course I’m doing my own studying, but it helps to read what someone similar has discovered for themselves. I pray God will continue to give you the grace and strength for this task, as I can imagine there are many people in opposition to your writing of these things.

  3. This is so very sad to read. I could just see the look on the Apostle Paul’s face who urged us to pray in tongues. As a man who only boasted in the Lord, he spoke more in tongues than them all. Many of your observations appear to be born out of some axe to grind from past negative encounters and it shows. Your own words overlaid as a template upon God’s Word are misaligned and therefore misleading God’s people and yes, you will be held accountable for that one day.

    The heart is sick above all else and who can know it.

    Here is the truth about the severity of what you are doing Dawn: “and they bend their tongue like the bow; lies and not truth prevail in the land before they proceed from evil to evil, and they do not know Me declares the Lord. Let everyone be on guard against his neighbor and do not trust any brother because every brother deals craftily, and every neighbor goes about as a slanderer. And everyone deceives his neighbor and does not speak the truth, they have taught their tongue to speak lies; they weary themselves committing iniquity.” Jeremiah 9:3-5
    This goes for your teaching errors regarding deliverance as well. It is one thing to espouse and walk in deception, but to then call it truth and “teach” others is a grave misstep. I am so sorry for this world wide display against the Holy Spirit.
    ~Nancy Horne

    1. Hi, Nancy. I am aware of my accountability, which is why I share the Word of God in context. I would respectfully ask for you to provide specific examples from this post as well as the one on deliverance where I misappropriated Scripture because your accusation is severe and slanderous, which is ironically what you accuse me of by using Jeremiah 9:3-5. 1 Corinthians 14 brought correction to the church there for their misuse of tongues, their elevation of tongues as superior over other gifts, and the lack of order in corporate gatherings in its use. There is debate as to if there is a private prayer language. The gift of tongues in Scripture is clearly the miraculous ability to speak in a language known in the world but unknown to the speaker. Interpretation followed as the gospel of Jesus Christ also accompanied. Please see Acts 2, Acts 10, Acts 11, and Acts 19. I encourage you to read them fully and in context so nothing is misunderstood. It was not unintelligible speech. Even Paul spoke of instruments making distinct sounds and a trumpet making a distinct sound for battle because if they did not, there was essentially no meaning to be understood.

      You referenced when Paul said he spoke in tongues more than anyone. The full verse is this, “I thank God that I speak in tongues more than all of you. Nevertheless, in church I would rather speak five words with my mind in order to instruct others, than ten thousand words in a tongue.” (1 Corinthians 14:18,19) I am concerned that people are abusing the Word of God to perpetuate doctrines that are unBiblical, such as the teaching that you must speak in tongues to be Spirit filled. If someone wants to hold to a private prayer language even though the Scripture does not explicitly state there is a private prayer language, I consider that a secondary issue if that individual holds to the core tenets of Biblical Christianity as I have stated.
      You seem to be placing me outside of the Kingdom of God because I am pointing people back to Scripture and offering up critical thinking. I would urge you to consider what you are doing as you have misappropriated Scripture by quoting Jeremiah 9:3-5 in this matter by doing such a thing, and you are being slanderous. This passage is Jeremiah lamenting over the people of Israel who have no fidelity for God, no saving knowledge of God, and in essence do not know Him. For this, they cannot be trusted.

      The burden is now on you. Please provide specific examples where I have misappropriated Scripture. Please provide where I have slandered and testified falsely. Please provide the errors I have brought forth regarding deliverance in accordance with Scripture. Stating what I was told and what I told others for years in this movement is not an axe to grind. Respectfully, it is stating fact. I am not concerned about what the apostle Paul thinks of me, nor do I imagine what his face looked like in writing this. I am more concerned about standing before God and being accountable for words and actions that did not glorify Him or testify of Him. We do agree, however. It is one thing to espouse and walk in deception, but to then call it truth and teach others is a grave misstep. Those are your words. I agree. That is why I share the things I do because the Word of God is being misappropriated, people are Biblically illiterate (I was one of those) and they are being led astray and placed into bondage while not understanding true freedom in Christ. Thank you for taking the time to comment. Grace and peace to you.

      Dawn Hill

  4. Thank you for your obedience to share and your boldness to stand against the opposition you will face. Your words ring with the truth and sincerity of someone who has faithfully sought to know God and understand His word. May others be blessed through this message.

  5. Dawn,
    Thank you for a very articulate and clear article regarding yet another false teaching and practice within the modern church.
    My brief history is that I started well in a sound doctrine church; fell amongst false doctrine and its teachers for 24 years; then was delivered by God over 4 years ago.
    Like others who were extricated by the grace of God, I placed EVERYTHING on the altar and went back to study for myself the Scriptures by applying sound hermeneutics and allowing Scripture to interpret Scripture!
    Simply stated the NT authors were inspired by God to record warnings and sound doctrine which were against pagan practices and doctrines which were attempting to be mingled into Christianity. Jesus and essentially every NT book are shouting, “be not deceived; let no one deceive you!”

    I am not trying to be lengthy in my thoughts but I do wish to include a few notes from my studies in which I endeavored to find truth and reject the false. Prayerfully others will do their own studies in Scripture and seek to reject the doctrines of men which have made the word of God of none effect.

    John, the longest living disciple died around 100AD. He mentored Polycarp (69-155AD) who mentored Irenaeus (130-202AD.) Irenaeus wrote much as he contended for the faith and sought to expose the heresies which were already contaminating the doctrine of Jesus. Here are but a few bullet points on a lengthy study:

    Clement and Gnosticism in Rome c. AD 60
    · Clement recorded in Recognitions of Clement the beginning of the demonic heresy of Gnosticism
    · Simon Magus (Acts 8: 9-11, 18-23) a Samaritan who went to Egypt to study magic
    · When he returned, he converted most of the Samaritans to his doctrine
    · He mixed Egyptian magic with Judaism and later added Christianity….he created what the ancient church called Gnosticism
    · Acts 8:18 And when Simon saw that through the laying on of the apostles’ hands the Holy Spirit was given, he offered them money (want to get activated: join my network, pay to go to my school, etc)
    · Most Gnostics taught the use of mantras, from Eastern pagan practices, to bring about the effect of and ecstasy, or altered state of consciousness to receive visions (Iraneaus, Against Heresies; Hippolytus, Heresies)
    · Mantra: originally in Hinduism and Buddhism; a word or sound repeated to aid concentration in meditation. Mantras are mini meditations. Alters one’s consciousness!
    · The modern church is replete with “worship music” which is nothing but mantras and hypnotic chords and sounds which places one in an altered state of consciousness…which allows the false doctrine entrance because one already “feels good” so this “must be God.”
    · Mantras and meditation, Contemplative Prayer, are mainstream and dominate modern “Christianity.”
    · Ecclesiastes 1:9 …that which has been is that which will be….nothing new.
    · Matt. 6:7 But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do: for they think that they shall be heard for their much speaking.
    · The Bible is the handbook for how to avoid deception; how to spot deception; and what not to do in order to stay out of the plethora of deceptions. But again, it’s old, not new

    · AD 174 – 189 Eleutherus and Montanus
    · Pope Eleutherus (#12) was deceived by the false prophet and cult leader: Montanus
    · #12 declared Montanus to be a true prophet of God in AD 177
    · Irenaeus travelled to Rome to persuade #12 to publicly declare Montanus a false prophet and excommunicate him
    · Montanus: said he was the “other” comforter Jesus said would come
    · He brought in a new form of “prophecy”…a “vain babbling” was used to alter the person’s consciousness so that he could CHANNEL the Holy Spirit.
    · The vain babbling was from the Eastern practices of unintelligible “tongues” and was Montanus’s attempt to legitimize and mix the pagan practices and validate his new teachings as “Christian.”
    · This is the same occult system of sorcery used by the Hindus, TM practitioners, and practitioners of Contemplative Prayer

    · The ancient church fathers said no OT or NT prophet or teacher ever practiced “vain babbling”

    · Eusebius describes the “ecstasy” as a false system that does away with the real spiritual gifts, since it circumvents the Holy Spirit to reach another spirit
    · Montanists set aside the gift of the Spirit, which in the latter times has been, by he good pleasure of the Father, poured out upon the human race. They do not understand the evangelical dispensation presented by John’s Gospel, in which the Lord promised that He would sent the Paraclete [John 16]; but set aside at once both the Gospel and the prophetic Spirit. Wretched men indeed who wish to be pseudo-prophets, forsooth (forsook), but who set aside the gift of prophecy from the Church. We must conclude, moreover, that the Montanists cannot understand the Apostle Paul, either. For, in his Epistle to the Corinthians, he speaks expressly of prophetical gifts, and recognizes men and women prophesying in the Church, sinning therefore, in all these particulars, against the Spirit of God.” [ Irenaeus, Against Heresies]

    · Tertullian is quoted as saying the “ecstasy” is not being in one’s right mind
    · We see the same thing today: the “ecstasy” of the false system circumventing the Holy Spirit and tapping into false tongues, false prophecies, false gifts, false signs and wonders.

    God’s gift was intelligible, known tongues (languages) in which a person could communicate with someone of a different tongue in order to testify of Jesus and teach others the way to the Father.
    Montanus’s vain babblings were used to induce altered consciousness, have a spiritual experience and elevate self.
    One points to Jesus the other points to self.

    Test every spirit, doctrine and teaching. A careful study of early church history will reveal that we have swallowed many doctrines of man…carefully inserted by Satan who masquerades as an angel of light.
    2 Cor. 11:3-4
    2 Cor. 11:13-15
    1 Peter 1:12-21
    2 Peter 2:1-3
    2 Peter 3:14-18
    Acts 20:28-30
    Matt. 7:15-20
    Selah.
    Shalom.

  6. When I was 18 I went from atheism to finding Christ and becoming the member of a traditional church. I then attended a very conservative Bible College and eventually went with my husband as a missionary to Indians living in the Amazon. Years later, while we out in a city, the Lord very clearly called me to be an intercessor and I agreed. The next day I was in a meeting where the speaker began describing the gifts of the Spirit. I sat there, fiercely criticizing everything he said. I wanted nothing to do with that! Suddenly, the Lord told me, “I want to do something in your heart. Is it okay?” I had no clue as to what He was talking about, but I said, “Of course, Lord.” To my surprise, I felt His Spirit wash away my pride and many hangups and then He filled me back up to overflowing. At that point I “knew” I could pray in tongues. But the Lord told me not to. My husband had told me to have nothing to do with tongues (and I was in total agreement with him). I “knew” I had to ask for his permission first. And I was not to tell anyone else about what happened until I told him. But I could not bring myself to tell him that. I was convinced that he would think I had gone crazy or was demon-possessed and it would cause him tremendous anxiety. I could not conceive of him approving of such a thing, so why worry him? Shortly afterward we went back to our home in the Indian community. The first night there, an Indian friend came to me and said, “You were filled with the Spirit, weren’t you?” I was shocked. “How did you know?” I asked. She said, “My little boy saw you in a dream with tongues of fire above your head.” At that point I knew I had to tell my husband. When I did, he sat in shock for many many long minutes. Finally he said, “I have been asking God for a Scripture, and the only thing that keeps coming to me over and over is ‘Forbid not to speak in tongues.’ So I can’t forbid you. But you said you have never done that, right? So I give you my permission because I don’t think you can do it.” Thus began my ministry of Spirit-led intercession in which I prayed often with my mind but also with the Spirit in tongues. I saw the outpouring of the Spirit in Acts 2 as, at least in part, an anointing of Christ’s royal priesthood, and I understood tongues as, at least in part, the enabling of His priests to intercede. There are many times when my mind does not know what specific things to pray for someone, and I am grateful that I can pray for them anyway. And I am pretty sure that is what Paul was talking about when he said he spoke in tongues more than them all.

    1. Thank you Diana, for a solid, testimonial, Scriptural response. Not everything taught in the ‘Pentecostal’ movement was wrong. More, I would say, of a wrong focus, and creating an incorrect perspective on what it really means to be be ‘filled with the Spirit.’ When the focus is more on tongues than on the Holy Spirit, ‘being filled with the Spirit’ loses it’s meaning, purposes, and effectiveness. I would like to share your story if I may, anonymously. Thank you again, for speaking up.

  7. Hi Dawn. I’m so sorry for a severely, harsh, judgmental, cruel comment above, totally unnecessary, even in disagreement.

    I have mentioned, in your last blog comments section, that I read all of your blogs, as I am on a similar ‘spiritual detox’ journey. I have had to re-evaluate everything as well, right down to the bare bones born again, gospel message.

    Of course, this has included serious tho’t and re-examination of being ‘Spirit filled’, and speaking in tongues.

    I agree that ‘Spirit filled’ should be taking into consideration maturity in the Lord, surrender to and guidance by the Holy Spirit.

    A few Scriptures come to mind when discussing ‘speaking in tongues’ as only foreign languages not known by the speaker. I understand that Acts 2:6 refers to the disciples speaking in the languages of those from other countries. This phenomena is one aspect of speaking in tongues.

    1 Cor. 14:2-4 describes something more than foreign languages. “For he who speaks in a tongue does not speak to men, but to God. Indeed, no one understands him; he utters mysteries in the Spirit. The one who speaks in a tongue edifies himself, but the one who prophesies edifies the church.”

    Here in v.5 Paul is referring to tongues and interpretation as one of the 9 gifts of the Spirit, but he also says he desires that all speak in tongues, separate from the gift of tongues and interpretation.

    “Now I desire you all to speak in tongues, but rather that you should prophesy. Now the one prophesying is greater than the one speaking in tongues, unless he should interpret, so that the church might receive edification.”

    In verse 28 he says; “But if there is no interpreter, he should remain silent in the church and speak only to himself and God.”

    Here again Paul talks of praying with his spirit in an unknown tongue, and with his understanding.

    “For if I pray in a tongue, my spirit prays, but my mind is unfruitful. What then shall I do? I will pray with my spirit, but I will also pray with my mind. I will sing with my spirit, but I will also sing with my mind.” 1 Cor. 14:14-15

    There are clearly 2 functions of the gift of tongues, praying privately to the Lord in an unknown tongue, and speaking in public in an unknown tongue with interpretation.

    The reference in Acts 2:6-11 of foreign languages, does not limit praying in tongues to that, as is seen elsewhere, with other dimensions of ‘praying in an unknown tongue.’

    I am in continual process, on my ‘spiritual detox’ journey, constantly re-evaluating, weighing everything according to Scripture. Scripture is all I have, to determine truth, and I gauge everything by it. I believe Scripture does clearly communicate ‘unknown tongues’ to be more than foreign languages, a spiritual phenomena, a gift, an ability from the Holy Spirit, for the purpose of personal edification.

    Just as tongues and interpretation are supernatural, so is the ability to simply pray in ‘tongues.’ “The one who speaks in a tongue edifies himself.”

    “So, my brothers, be eager to prophesy, and do not forbid speaking in tongues.” 1 Cor. 14:39

Comments are closed.

Comments are closed.
Social media & sharing icons powered by UltimatelySocial